This week, I am extremely proud to present a uniting of forces of Pipe School and another member of the online pipe community, simply known as “quantumboy7″ to many. Jim, as he is known to those uninitiated in the world of pipes, has dedicated himself to reviewing a single brand of tobacco straight through with incredible amounts of detail and information.

One of these sagas is known as the Pease Pilgrimage. The individual reviews were published in serialized form on some pipe forums. After I read these reviews and saw the scope that they covered, along with the devotion to detail, I knew that this was something that needed to reach as many people as possible.

In order to facilitate that goal, I will be posting some of Jim’s reviews every month.

So, with no further delay, here is Jim’s review of Pease’s Abingdon. Thank you, Jim, for all of your hard work; I know it’s a tough job reviewing pipe tobacco, but someone has to do it!

Abingdon (reviewed 01-08-10)

Tin date: 03/26/09

Aroma: Smoky, but a bit more austere than Odyssey – not as rich and campfire-smoky. It just seems a bit more reluctant to release its odors, but this could be because it’s a drier tin than the Odyssey I tried recently. Odyssey is a much blacker blend, which to me would mean more Latakia, but Pease’s description of Odyssey tells us that Odyssey is “A huge Latakia blend, second only to Abingdon in forcefulness.” Not sure if that means it is second to Abingdon in its quantity of Latakia. Seems to me that Abingdon has less.

Appearance: The cut is quite coarse, with some large chunks of Latakia that really needed a little additional rubbing-out. For small chamber pipes, this coarse blend might be a little challenging. I think it works better in a large chamber pipe. The photo clearly shows that this blend does not have a lot of Latakia (I’m assuming the Latakia is the black bits). The tin description lists “Latakia,” “red and lemon yellow Virginias,” and “rich oriental leaf.” I believe all four are clearly visible in the mix. It looks like it could have been mixed up a bit better, as there were little pockets or gobs of one type of leaf here and there. It’s visually quite beautiful!

Pipe 1: Stanwell Vario Billiard

Pipe 2: Savinelli 320KS Author

Pipe 3: Dane Craft S Freehand

Flavor: The last time I tasted Abingdon is when I reviewed it on TR in May 2009, and in all three pipes it’s much more oriental-forward than I remembered. I think the balance is impeccable. I consider the definition of English vs. Balkan as a continuum, one blending into the other on a linear scale, which is consistent with Pease’s comments about some blends blurring the lines between the two. Abingdon seems to emphasize the orientals while maintaining a very significant Latakia presence.

I puffed as hard as I pleased and it didn’t bite, but of course that causes the flavors to become too burnt. As with every tobacco, this one should be respected, nurtured and contemplated, and Abingdon, due to its rich complexity and changing character, is a very special and delicious treat when smoked carefully. I think some of the change in flavors I experienced throughout a given bowl is due to the not-so-even mixture of the components themselves, along with the quite large chunks of a given tobacco. When one of those big pieces catches fire, it seems to emphasize that particular leaf during that part of the smoke. To me, this makes it interesting. But there is also a gradual change during the smoke toward a more smoky, richer flavor that just gets better and better right to the bottom.

The aftertaste lasts for a long time, a quarter to a half-hour or longer if you don’t eat or drink, and it emphasizes the orientals. This blend reminds me of the McClelland Three Oaks series. I would love to try this with Syrian Latakia just to explore the difference, but I understand Greg lost his stash of Syrian in a fire. Bummer!

It burned well with no problems. Pease suggest a lighter than normal pack, but while loading my pipes I had to pack it in with greater than average force because my tin was quite dry upon opening and the leaves were stiff. A typical gentle pack did not provide nearly enough density to get a good burn. This was not true with the Odyssey I opened last week (next week’s review). It was moister with a much finer cut.

Overall, this is an easy four star blend for me. I love the flavors and I love the complexity. The coarse cut, while it may alter your normal packing methods (or not, if your tin is moist), provides a visually interesting experience and allows you to clearly see exactly what you’re smoking. An excellent blend with which to start our pilgrimage! Please let us know your opinions!